• Home
  • News
  • Reports
  • About Us
    • About TaxWatch
    • Who we are
    • TaxWatch History
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Monthly Archives: May 2019

Tax Treaties, the source of the problem

2nd May 2019 by George Turner

Mel Stride, the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, recently confirmed concerns raised in the latest TaxWatch report, that the UK’s tax treaties will render the government’s latest attempt to tax the tech giants ineffective.

In our report we analysed the government’s recent policy announcements related to their attempts to tax major technology companies. We highlighted how its most significant measure, Offshore receipts in respect of intangible property, was not only expected to recoup only a fraction of the likely lost tax from such receipts but to collapse dramatically after just a couple of years of the measure coming into effect.

The measure imposes an income tax charge on UK royalty payments paid by companies to their subsidiaries in low tax jurisdictions. Royalties are a common mechanism by which companies divert profits from countries like the UK to tax havens.

Under the government’s impact analysis, the policy will raise just £475m in total in its first year of application (2020/21) – and dwindle to only £165m a year by 2023/24. Yet TaxWatch estimated that the lost tax from UK royalties paid to tax haven subsidiaries could be as much as £8bn a year.

Although the government did not explain either why this measure would recoup only a fraction of the likely lost tax or why it would so quickly become ineffective, we suggested that this collapse in revenue was most likely due to the government choosing not to apply the measure to countries where the UK had a tax treaty.

In response to this, companies would simply restructure their tax avoidance schemes to take advantage of this loophole. Indeed, with the long lead in before the policy was implemented, and the relatively small amount of tax the government forecast the measure would raise even in its first year of operation, it is clear that the government anticipated that many companies would restructure their affairs before it came into effect and that more would follow thereafter.

Following our report, Labour Shadow Treasury Minister Anneliese Dodds MP put down a couple of questions probing the government on how their new policy would be implemented.

In a response dated, 23 April, Mel Stride confirmed TaxWatch’s concerns, stating:

The Offshore receipts in respect of intangible property measure targets multinational groups that realise intangible property income from UK sales in low or no-tax jurisdictions.

The government has been clear that this measure will be applied in compliance with the UK’s international obligations. This means that the measure will only apply to low-tax jurisdictions with which the UK does not have a full tax treaty.

In a later response dated April 29, Mr Stride provided a list of countries which have a full tax treaty with the UK, by which they mean a treaty containing “an appropriate non-discrimination article”.

The list, which can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/international-manual/intm412090 is revealing

On the list provided can be seen some classic tax haven jurisdictions including, Ireland, The Netherlands, the UAE, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Malta, Mauritius, Panama and Liechtenstein.

What’s more, the UK has recently signed new treaties with Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man and it is not clear why they would not also qualify for the government’s exemption to this measure.

With the UK refusing to apply its anti-tax avoidance measures to tax havens, it is easy to see why their efforts to crack down on tax avoidance will ultimately be ineffective.

As we argued in our recent report, contrary to the position stated by Mr Stride, there is no international obligation for the UK to not apply such measures to countries where it has a treaty relationship. Tax treaties were established with the purpose of stopping companies and individuals from being taxed on the same income twice. They were never designed to allow taxable income to escape tax anywhere.

Indeed, as we noted in our report, the measure is specifically designed to apply in certain circumstances even where there is a tax treaty. The problem is that it is deliberately designed in such a way that it will hardly ever so apply. What is not clear is why. The courts have been supportive of the UK in the past when it has sought to close down tax avoidance schemes that use the UK’s tax treaty network to escape taxation. The government choosing not to apply this measure to treaty countries is a policy choice, not an obligation. Why it has made that choice, remains a mystery.

If the government wants its attempts to tax the tech giants to have real impact, it must now move to apply its income tax charge on royalties to countries which do have a tax treaty with the UK. A good start would be to apply the measure to Ireland, a country which has been actively encouraging companies to move their IP to its jurisdiction in order to help them avoid tax in countries around the world.

Photo by James Newcombe on Unsplash

Press contacts

For all media enquiries about TaxWatch, or if you would like to be added to our media email list, please contact:

Claire Ralph

Director

email: claire@taxwatchuk.org

Tel: +44 7494 922661

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • February 2019
    • November 2018
    • October 2018

    Categories

    • About us
    • Coronavirus
    • Events
    • HMRC sanctions
    • Income tax avoidance
    • Issues
    • Multinational Companies
    • News
    • News & Media
    • Online Marketplaces
    • Press relases
    • Public Service
    • Regulation of professionals
    • Tax Fraud
    • Tax Gap
    • Tax Policy
    • Tax subsidies
    • TaxWatch in the news
    • Tech
    • Uncategorised
    • VAT

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org


    TaxWatch

    c/o M & A Solicitors

    38 Coney Street

    York

    YO1 9ND

     

    info@taxwatchuk.org

    Copyright © 2023 TaxWatch

     

     

    Follow us on X (Twitter)